Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boxie24

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:35, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Boxie24

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable firm. Refs are essential PR, repeating each other. No corresponding article in deWP, which covers truly notable German companies quite fully DGG ( talk ) 04:51, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:41, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:42, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Some of the references appear to be okay, particularly those from what seem to be established daly newspapers. In some, Boxie24 is covered as part of the overall self storage market. Most of the articles include a byline, which wouldn't be the case if the newspaper reprinted a press release. I found comparable coverage of the Canadian self-storage industry here (Boxie24 is not mentioned, and does not operate in Canada), and that's in The Globe and Mail, a newspaper of record, which I think demonstrates that other self-storage companies can be notable. The Arabic-language reference ("Emirates Airline and Cricks celebrate successful partnership") does not mention Boxie24 at all. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as paid-for spam. I have blocked the author for undisclosed paid editing. MER-C 15:14, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom, refs fail the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:22, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.